diff options
author | Bradley Taunt <bt@btxx.org> | 2024-06-08 13:43:37 -0400 |
---|---|---|
committer | Bradley Taunt <bt@btxx.org> | 2024-06-08 13:43:37 -0400 |
commit | 16d28628aca9b2d356de31c319f5e7bc0f5b2b02 (patch) | |
tree | 11947abb71e38cbe75116871694a44c33d257763 /build/over-engineering-an-oil-tank/index.html | |
parent | dcfb172704f3afb68a30425029ec834be2883274 (diff) |
Remove incorrectly generated files, fix up markdown articles
Diffstat (limited to 'build/over-engineering-an-oil-tank/index.html')
-rw-r--r-- | build/over-engineering-an-oil-tank/index.html | 22 |
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 20 deletions
diff --git a/build/over-engineering-an-oil-tank/index.html b/build/over-engineering-an-oil-tank/index.html index e5c88ef..6dab39b 100644 --- a/build/over-engineering-an-oil-tank/index.html +++ b/build/over-engineering-an-oil-tank/index.html @@ -3,11 +3,12 @@ <head> <meta charset="utf-8"> <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1"> + <meta name="color-scheme" content="dark light"> <link rel="icon" href="data:,"> <title>Over-Engineering an Oil Tank Gauge</title> <link href="/atom.xml" type="application/atom+xml" rel="alternate" title="Atom feed for blog posts" /> <link href="/rss.xml" type="application/rss+xml" rel="alternate" title="RSS feed for blog posts" /> -<style>*{box-sizing:border-box;}body{font-family:sans-serif;line-height:1.33;margin:0 auto;max-width:650px;padding:1rem;}img{max-width:100%;}pre{border:1px solid;overflow:auto;padding:5px;}table{text-align:left;width:100%;}.footnotes{font-size:90%;}</style> +<style>*{box-sizing:border-box;}body{font-family:sans-serif;line-height:1.33;margin:0 auto;max-width:650px;padding:1rem;}blockquote{background:rgba(0,0,0,0.1);border-left:4px solid;padding-left:5px;}img{max-width:100%;}pre{border:1px solid;overflow:auto;padding:5px;}table{text-align:left;width:100%;}.footnotes{font-size:90%;}</style> </head> <nav> @@ -16,21 +17,13 @@ <main> <h1 id="over-engineering-an-oil-tank-gauge">Over-Engineering an Oil Tank Gauge</h1> - <p>2020-09-09</p> - <p>I almost went down the path of investing a huge amount of time and effort into fixing a stuck oil fuel tank float-gauge in my house. Recently, the float mechanism became stuck and permanently displayed <code>empty</code> regardless of how much fuel was in the tank - not ideal. It’s a 20 year-old tank, so I wasn’t surprised that the float finally gave out. </p> - <p>Being the wannabe tinkerer that I am, a light bulb went off in my head and I started thinking on how to incorporate some ultrasonic system to display the accurate fuel reading digitally. Obviously my first thought was just to replace the float gauge with a new one and be done with it. That didn’t sound very <em>fun</em> though.</p> - <p>I briefly looked at other similar projects and started brainstorming the best way I would implement this for my own situation. The best option I came across seemed to be this: <a href="https://scottiestech.info/2017/10/24/diy-ultrasonic-fuel-gauge-level-sensor/">DIY Ultrasonic Fuel Gauge / Level Sensor</a></p> - <p>An ultrasonic system with a cool mini display sounded pretty rad - much cooler than just replacing the broken gauge with a new float arm. So it was settled.</p> - <h2 id="my-oil-think-tank">My oil think-tank</h2> - <p>I quickly thought through my options in my head before jumping too far into things (and even included a “poor-mans” temperature strip option):</p> - <table> <thead> <tr> @@ -39,7 +32,6 @@ <th>Time</th> </tr> </thead> - <tbody> <tr> <td>Ultrasonic Gauge</td> @@ -58,25 +50,15 @@ </tr> </tbody> </table> - <p>My mind was still set on building and implementing the ultrasonic option. It would be a great learning experience at the very least!</p> - <p>So, before I ordered any parts or started designing a case that would house this new super-cool device, I went to investigate/remove the float gauge to get a better look at the damage. With the help of some penetrating oil (the original installer went crazy with the pipe dope) and my trusty wrench, I opened up the gauge cap, partly lifting the float from the tank. Right away I noticed that the float and shaft were slightly stuck together in one small area. I poked it with my finger.</p> - <p><em>The float set itself back into the correct position. It was fixed.</em></p> - <p>How could I have been so dumb. I was so excited about <em>building something</em> that I jumped into implementation before fully realizing the problem. Talk about a metaphor for web dev, am I right?</p> - <h2 id="overthinking-simple-problems">Overthinking simple problems</h2> - <p>I can’t speak for all designers / developers out there, but I catch myself (far more often than I’d like to admit) over-engineering a solution because of some perceived notion that it is the “best” option. Most of the time it isn’t actually better, it just seems more <em>fun</em>.</p> - <p>Now don’t get me wrong, fun is a good thing most of the time. It’s just that some instances call for the quickest, cleanest, easiest solution in the name of efficiency - just be sure to have fully explored the problem <em>first</em>.</p> - <h2 id="final-decision">Final decision</h2> - <p>So I ended up doing nothing. I simply re-threaded the cap and placed the float back inside the tank. I know I saved myself time and money, but I can’t help but feel like I failed…</p> - <p>Just like in the world of software, it’s best to avoid over-engineering simple problems.</p> <footer role="contentinfo"> <h2>Menu Navigation</h2> |