From cc88791c71d3a62879a11995ee454d7e612a8d94 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: bt Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2023 18:51:59 -0500 Subject: --- posts/default-html-style-updates.md | 10 ++++------ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) (limited to 'posts/default-html-style-updates.md') diff --git a/posts/default-html-style-updates.md b/posts/default-html-style-updates.md index 578628f..20b1d3a 100644 --- a/posts/default-html-style-updates.md +++ b/posts/default-html-style-updates.md @@ -1,6 +1,5 @@ -# Modern Improvements for Default Browser Styles - -2021-11-09 +[[!meta title="Modern Improvements for Default Browser Styles"]] +[[!meta date="2021-11-09"]] This website *almost* exclusively uses the browser's (whichever one that might be) default styling to render it's HTML. I firmly believe, and have [stated in a previous post](/css-js-mistake/), that the default HTML styling across all browsers is a thing of beauty. "Consistent and boring" is how I tend to refer to default browser styles - and I mean that in a *good way*. @@ -86,8 +85,7 @@ There isn't much else to say, really. I think these tiny tweaks would greatly im } -## Refs +[^1]: `18px` seems to be the perfect sweet spot between "almost too large, yet not small enough to strain my eyes" -1. `18px` seems to be the perfect sweet spot between "almost too large, yet not small enough to strain my eyes" -2. At the time of this article's publish date +[^2]: At the time of this article's publish date -- cgit v1.2.3-54-g00ecf